World Hippo Day, Hurray.
Donate here:
http://go.saveanimalsfacingextinction.org/page/s/save-hippos?source=MS_EM_PET_2017.12.26_B2_Hippos_X__F1_S1_C1__all_RS&email=paulb@verizon.net&firstname=Paul&lastname=Babicki&zip=08560
The Cc: field
All
of the Netiquette outlined in the previous section applies to the Cc:
field. Care must be given for insuring
that protection of privacy is absolutely provided for in this field which is
visible to all recipients. Those who are
included here, as a rule, should be parties who have a direct interest in the
subject. These people should not be
addressed in the salutation or body of text as their roles are passive and are
not expected to reply or take action unless explicitly asked to do so. If multiple responses are initiated more
addressees should not be added unless it is clear that the previous information
is appropriate to those added. If this
is not the case, the thread should be removed.
Those who are included in the Cc: field generally should not be active
in responding to the message without good reasons.
Many
add bosses, supervisors or persons of higher rank in a Cc: Most of the time, this is for good
reason. However, to include such persons
to override an option, seek to impress or have motives outside the issue at
hand, should be seriously considered because
of the risk of changing the tone, range or spirit of the communication.
Conversely,
there are circumstances in email threads for dropping someone from a To:, Cc:
or Bcc: field. Since threads can last for a number of messages, what began as a
courtesy for some might become a nuisance to those receiving them. If
there is diminishing or no further real significance for their involvement,
Netiquette considerations should be given to determine if addressees should be
dropped. Also, beginning a new mail
thread might be the most useful way to disengage from longer threads.
Besides
maintaining appropriate form, content and consideration, good “Netiquette” goes
beyond these disciplines. Do not Cc:
groups if your email is to your supervisor(s) or persons of authority. This can be interpreted in a very negative
way and can prove to be a significant embarrassment.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Good Netiquette
And A Green Internet To All! =====================================================================
Tabula Rosa Systems - Tabula Rosa
Systems (TRS) is dedicated to providing Best of Breed Technology and
Best of Class Professional Services to our Clients. We have a portfolio of products which we
have selected for their capabilities, viability and value. TRS provides
product, design, implementation and support services on all products that we
represent. Additionally, TRS provides expertise in Network Analysis, eBusiness
Application Profiling, ePolicy and eBusiness Troubleshooting.
We can be contacted at:
sales@tabularosa.net
or 609 818 1802.
===============================================================
In addition to
this blog, Netiquette IQ has a
website with great assets which are being added to on a regular basis. I have
authored the premiere book on Netiquette, “Netiquette IQ - A Comprehensive
Guide to Improve, Enhance and Add Power to Your Email". My new book,
“You’re Hired! Super Charge Your Email Skills in 60 Minutes. . . And Get That
Job!” has just been published and will be followed by a trilogy of books on
Netiquette for young people. You can view my profile, reviews of the book and
content excerpts at:
Anyone who
would like to review the book and have it posted on my blog or website, please
contact me paul@netiquetteiq.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment